Non-passporting licence routeVASP licence / registrationNo passporting

VASP Licence in the United Arab Emirates

The UAE SCA VASP route is a high-reputation option for crypto businesses targeting UAE and MENA operations with local substance, PSP access and activity-specific controls. It is not an EU passporting route or a low-budget offshore setup.

Processing time
From 3 months
Service price
21 700 EUR
Required share capital
50 000 AED
State fee
From 10 000 AED
Annual supervision fee
From 15 000 AED
Banking difficulty
Medium
RegulatorSecurities and Commodities Authority (SCA)
Market access
No passporting

Content is based on CSV values only and requires UAE legal review before being used as definitive regulatory advice.

Regulatory status should be confirmed by local counsel before relying on this route.

What is the UAE SCA VASP route?

The UAE VASP route is positioned around the Securities and Commodities Authority for virtual asset service provider licensing or registration at UAE level. It should be assessed separately from a Dubai-only VARA route because the regulator, operating perimeter and local setup assumptions can differ.

VASP
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Regulator
Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA)
Regime
VASP
Legal basis
Regulator in the CSV snapshot: Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA).

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Activity scope for UAE VASP planning

The application should start with a precise activity map, not with the assumption that one generic VASP permission covers every crypto model. Exchange, custody, brokerage, wallet, advisory, transfer and payment-adjacent flows can create different control and approval requirements.

  • Exchange

    Licensed

    Exchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.

  • Custody

    Licensed

    Custody is within scope; review controls requirements.

  • Brokerage

    Licensed

    Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.

  • Wallet provider

    Licensed

    Exchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.

  • EU market

    Not covered

    EU passporting not available from this route.

  • Startups

    Not covered

    High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

UAE VASP operating model

A credible UAE file should connect the local entity, SCA-facing activity scope, accountable staff, physical office, audit plan, AML framework, technology controls and PSP package into one operating model.

  • Plan for local staff and a physical office from the start, because both are marked as required in the CSV snapshot.

    Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.

  • Budget for application work, state fees, annual supervision fees, audit and ongoing compliance, not only incorporation.

    Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.

  • Prepare governance, AML, sanctions, custody, complaints, outsourcing and cybersecurity documentation around the selected activities.

    Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

UAE route vs Dubai VARA and offshore alternatives

The UAE SCA route can be attractive when the business needs UAE and MENA positioning, strong payment provider availability and a reputable local setup. It is less suitable when the main goal is EU passporting, the lowest possible budget or a fast offshore launch with minimal substance.

  • Regulatory reputation

    Onshore (this jurisdiction)

    High

    Offshore comparison

    Lower recognition

  • Banking access

    Onshore (this jurisdiction)

    Challenging

    Offshore comparison

    Often restricted

  • Compliance burden

    Onshore (this jurisdiction)

    High

    Offshore comparison

    Variable

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

When the UAE VASP route is not suitable

The UAE SCA route is not the right answer for every crypto business. It is a high-complexity and high-maintenance option, so the commercial case should justify the substance and compliance burden.

  • The business needs EU/EEA passporting rather than UAE or MENA access.

  • The budget cannot support local staff, office, audit, state fees and annual supervision.

  • The model is still an early MVP without mature AML, custody, technology or PSP documentation.

  • The objective is a very low-budget offshore setup rather than a regulated UAE operating presence.

Consider instead

  • Dubai VASPDubai-only VARA route with strong market recognition
  • Malta (MiCA) MICAEU/EEA passporting for European client acquisition
  • Canada (MSB) MSBFaster registration route for selected models

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Activity fit for this route

Review which crypto activities fit within the scope of this route.

Exchange
Suitable

Exchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.

Custody
Suitable

Custody is within scope; review controls requirements.

Brokerage
Suitable

Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.

Wallet provider
Suitable

Exchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.

EU market
Not suitable

EU passporting not available from this route.

Startups
Not suitable

High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.

Not sure if your model fits? Request a licensing assessment

Business model fit — United Arab Emirates

Assess how well this route covers your planned activities.

Fit score

Good fit
4/6
Partial fit
2/6
Poor fit
0/6

United Arab Emirates is a strong fit for your activity profile

This route covers your key activities. Proceed with detailed legal review.

Is United Arab Emirates VASP authorisation right for your project?

Best for

  • UAE and MENA crypto operations

Not suitable for

  • Very low-budget setup

Core requirements

Use this section to check the main regulatory and operational requirements before committing to a jurisdiction.

Required share capital50 000 AED
Required
Local staffRequired
Required
Physical officeRequired
Required
AuditRequired
Required

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Local staff, office and audit

The UAE route should be treated as a substance-heavy VASP project. Local staff, a physical office and audit are all required in the CSV snapshot, which makes the jurisdiction stronger for serious operations but poor for very low-budget setups.

Local staff

Required

Required

At least one locally-accountable staff member or director is expected.

Physical office

Required

Required

A genuine office presence is expected, not a nominal registered address.

Audit

Required

Required

External audit is required for ongoing supervision compliance.

Planning notes

  • Define who will be locally accountable for compliance, operations and regulator interaction.
  • Match office and staffing assumptions to the activity scope, expected client base and outsourcing model.
  • Include audit readiness and ongoing reporting in the launch budget.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Cost breakdown

Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.

Service price (professional fees)Application preparation and professional services.
21 700 EUR EURFixed
State fee
From 10 000 AEDFrom
Annual supervision feeRecurring annual cost after authorisation.
From 15 000 AEDFrom
Required share capitalMust be held, not an expenditure.
50 000 AEDFrom
High ongoing cost

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Cost breakdown — United Arab Emirates

Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.

Cost itemAmount
Service priceApplication preparation and professional services.€21,700
State fee€10,000
Required share capitalMust be held, not an expenditure.€50,000

Summary

One-off costs
€81,700
Annual (year 1)
€0
Total year 1
€81,700

Adjust to convert to your base currency.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Application process

The sequence below shows the usual project flow. Exact steps depend on the regulator, business model and application scope. United Arab Emirates — From 3 months.

Total timelineFrom 3 months
  1. Pre-assessment and scope review

    1–3 weeks

    Define the activity scope, governance model and target markets before formal preparation.

  2. Company setup in United Arab Emirates

    2–6 weeks

    Establish legal entity, appoint local staff and set up local operating structure.

  3. Documentation and compliance packBottleneck risk

    3–8 weeks

    Prepare AML/CFT policies, governance documents, controls framework and application materials.

  4. Application submission to Securities and Commodities Authority

    1–2 weeks

    Submit complete application with all required documentation.

  5. Regulator reviewBottleneck risk

    From 3 months

    Regulator reviews the application. May request clarifications. Incomplete files extend this phase.

    Depends on: File quality and completeness

  6. Authorisation or registration confirmation

    1–4 weeks

    Regulator confirms authorisation or registration. Commence operations.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

What can delay or increase cost

These factors are most likely to affect timelines and budgets for this route.

High setup complexity
High

Setup complexity is rated high for United Arab Emirates. Company setup, governance and documentation take longer than average.

Likely impactAdd 4–8 weeks to the preparation phase.
MitigationStart company setup and governance planning immediately after scope confirmation.
High maintenance cost
Medium

Ongoing supervision, audit and compliance costs are above average. Budget for these separately from the application fee.

Likely impactRecurring annual cost significantly above the one-time service price.
MitigationModel annual compliance costs before committing to this route.
Application completeness
Medium

Incomplete files are the most common cause of delay. Regulator queries extend review by weeks or months.

Likely impactEach regulator query adds 2–6 weeks to the review phase.
MitigationUse a structured compliance pack. Review file completeness before submission.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Banking and PSP feasibility

Banking difficulty is medium and PSP availability is high in the provided data, which supports the UAE/MENA use case. That does not make bank or PSP onboarding automatic: providers will still examine ownership, activity scope, fiat flows, token policy, AML controls and regulatory status.

Banking difficulty
Medium

Reflects how challenging it is to open and maintain business bank accounts in this jurisdiction.

Good PSP availability
Low

Reflects availability of payment service providers willing to onboard crypto-licensed entities.

A licence or registration does not guarantee bank account or payment provider approval. Banking feasibility should be reviewed before the application strategy is finalized.

Preparation checklist

  • Prepare a banking and PSP pack alongside the regulatory file.
  • Explain source of funds, transaction monitoring, sanctions controls and fiat settlement flows.
  • Avoid promising account opening before a provider has reviewed the specific model.

Compliance documentation

Most crypto licensing routes require a documented compliance framework before submission, not only after approval.

  • Required
    AML/CFT policy and risk assessmentDocument your customer risk model and control framework.
  • Required
    Customer due diligence (CDD) procedures
  • Required
    Enhanced due diligence (EDD) proceduresFor high-risk clients and jurisdictions.
  • Required
    Transaction monitoring system and rules
  • Required
    Sanctions screening procedures
  • Required
    Suspicious activity reporting (SAR) process
  • Required
    MLRO / Compliance officer appointmentLocal accountability may be required.
  • Recommended
    Board-approved governance charter
  • Conditional
    Outsourcing policy and monitoringRequired if functions are outsourced.
  • Recommended
    ICT / cybersecurity policy
  • Required
    Complaints handling procedure
  • Required
    Annual external audit engagementRequired for ongoing supervision compliance.

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Documents to prepare

Preparing these materials before filing reduces regulator questions and helps with banking or payment provider onboarding.

0 / 12 required
Required
Recommended
Depends on scope

Corporate documents

AML and compliance

Operational

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Regulator profile

Regulatory authority · United Arab Emirates

Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA)

Regulatory reputation
High

Strong international recognition and established supervision track record.

Setup complexity
High

Reflects documentation depth, governance requirements and expected review friction.

Regulatory risk
Medium

Reflects likelihood of delays, additional information requests or policy uncertainty.

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Risk assessment

Main risk dimensions for the United Arab Emirates route.

Setup complexity
High

Route risk rating — setup complexity: High.

Maintenance cost
High

Route risk rating — maintenance cost: High. Budget for ongoing compliance, fees and supervision separately.

Regulatory reputation
High

Route risk rating — regulatory reputation: High.

Regulatory risk
Medium

Route risk rating — regulatory risk: Medium. Weak compliance, vague scope or insufficient controls increase review risk.

Mitigation: Prepare an evidence-based compliance file before submission.

Banking difficulty
Medium

Route risk rating — banking difficulty: Medium. Authorisation does not guarantee bank account opening.

Mitigation: Start banking outreach and compliance preparation before the application.

This content is for general orientation only. Crypto regulation changes quickly and the final scope should be confirmed through a jurisdiction-specific legal review before filing or incorporation.

UAE VASP alternatives

Compare UAE/SCA with Dubai VARA for a Dubai-specific operating perimeter, MiCA for EU passporting, and registration routes such as Canada MSB where speed and cost matter more than a UAE-regulated presence.

Current

United Arab Emirates

VASP

Price
21 700 EUR
Timeline
From 3 months
Passporting
No passporting
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

Dubai

VASP

Price
22 300 EUR
Timeline
From 6 months
Passporting
No passporting
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

+ Dubai-only VARA route with strong market recognition

Separate Dubai scope and higher supervision budget

View route

Malta (MiCA)

MICA

Price
20 700 EUR
Timeline
From 6 months
Passporting
EU/EEA
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

+ EU/EEA passporting for European client acquisition

Requires EU substance and MiCA operating controls

View route

Canada (MSB)

MSB

Price
20 600 EUR
Timeline
From 2 months
Passporting
No passporting
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

+ Faster registration route for selected models

Registration only, not a full VASP licence

View route

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

United Arab Emirates vs other VASP jurisdictions

Compare key parameters across VASP-regulated jurisdictions.

Sort by:

Check your readiness for United Arab Emirates VASP authorisation

Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.

Share capital

50 000 AED minimum capital required.

AML/CFT framework

Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.

Governance structure

Board, management, accountability chain defined.

Banking preparation

Banking strategy and identified partners.

Local substance plan

Local staff and office in United Arab Emirates.

Readiness status

Answer the criteria on the left to see your readiness status.

Frequently asked questions

No. The activity scope should be mapped before filing. Exchange, custody, brokerage, wallet, advisory, transfer, staking and payment-adjacent features may require different evidence, limitations or permissions.

No. This page is for the UAE/SCA route. Dubai VARA is a Dubai-only route and should be assessed separately when the business will operate specifically in or from Dubai.

No. The CSV snapshot states no passporting. If EU/EEA market access is required, compare MiCA or CASP routes instead.

Usually no. The route has high setup complexity and high maintenance cost, with required local staff, physical office and audit.

Prepare the activity map, local entity plan, staffing and office assumptions, AML and sanctions framework, custody and technology controls, audit plan, banking and PSP package, and budget for state and annual supervision fees.

The page is not legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for advice from qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

Your dedicated specialists

  • Enrico Kärvinen

    Enrico

  • Rein Tammik

    Rein

  • Jurata Žukaitė

    Jurata

  • Andrej Kazlauskas

    Andrej

  • Marta Värna

    Marta

  • Katrin Lepik

    Katrin

  • Inga Stankavičiūtė

    Inga

Request a United Arab Emirates VASP assessment

Share your planned activities, target markets and timeline. We will review which crypto licensing route is likely to fit.

Leave open if you want a country comparison.
Select every activity you plan to offer. The licence route may change if you include custody, exchange, trading platform or fiat flows.
Include service fees, regulator fees, share capital, local office or staff, audit and ongoing compliance.

By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted about your crypto licensing request. Do not include passwords, private keys or confidential customer data.