VASP Licence in the Philippines
The Philippines is a BSP-supervised VASP licence and registration route for teams that need local virtual asset operations, can support high capital and substance requirements, and accept no passporting or low-cost launch positioning.
Regulatory status should be confirmed by local counsel before relying on this route.
What is a Philippines VASP route?
A Philippines VASP route is a Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas supervised licence and registration pathway for virtual asset service activity connected to the Philippines. It is an onshore operating route with no passporting and should be assessed against the exact services, client geography and fiat flow design.
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Regulator
- Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
- Regime
- VASP
- Legal basis
- Regulator: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Philippines VASP activity scope
The application should describe the exact VASP activity mix instead of treating the route as a generic crypto permission. Exchange is the strongest fit in the CSV snapshot, while custody, wallet, brokerage and payment-style features need careful boundary setting.
Exchange
LicensedExchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.
Exchange
Exchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.
LicensedCustody
ConditionalCustody may require separate review or additional controls.
Custody
Custody may require separate review or additional controls.
ConditionalBrokerage
ConditionalBrokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.
Brokerage
Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.
ConditionalWallet provider
ConditionalExchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
Wallet provider
Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
ConditionalEU market
Not coveredEU passporting not available from this route.
EU market
EU passporting not available from this route.
Not coveredStartups
Not coveredHigh setup complexity means significant budget is needed.
Startups
High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.
Not covered
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Operating model, capital and application file
The Philippines route is high-substance in the CSV snapshot: from 800 000 EUR share capital, local staff, physical office and audit are required. A credible application should connect those requirements with governance, fit-and-proper evidence and activity-specific controls.
Prepare ownership, directors, senior management and fit-and-proper documentation early.
Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.
Prepare ownership, directors, senior management and fit-and-proper documentation early.Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.
Align the capital plan, office footprint, local staff and audit model with the actual VASP activities.
Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.
Align the capital plan, office footprint, local staff and audit model with the actual VASP activities.Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.
Build AML, sanctions, transaction monitoring, outsourcing, cybersecurity and complaints materials before banking or PSP outreach.
Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.
Build AML, sanctions, transaction monitoring, outsourcing, cybersecurity and complaints materials before banking or PSP outreach.Operational control area that should be covered in the applicant's governance and compliance model.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Philippines onshore route vs lighter alternatives
The Philippines can make sense when the business case is local market access and BSP-supervised operations. The tradeoff is high setup complexity, high maintenance cost, medium regulatory reputation and no passporting leverage outside the Philippines.
Regulatory reputation
Onshore (this jurisdiction)
Medium
Offshore comparison
Lower recognition
Regulatory reputationMediumLower recognitionBanking access
Onshore (this jurisdiction)
Challenging
Offshore comparison
Often restricted
Banking accessChallengingOften restrictedCompliance burden
Onshore (this jurisdiction)
High
Offshore comparison
Variable
Compliance burdenHighVariable
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
When Philippines VASP is not suitable
The Philippines is a weak fit where the project needs a cheap launch, minimal substance, EU passporting or a broad claim that one permission covers every virtual asset product.
The core requirement is EU/EEA passporting or a pan-regional licence.
The project cannot support from 800 000 EUR share capital, office, staff, audit and high maintenance cost.
The business model depends on guaranteed banking or PSP onboarding.
The product includes securities, derivatives, lending, staking, DeFi or investment-like features without separate legal analysis.
Consider instead
- Malta (MiCA) MICA — EU/EEA passporting for European client acquisition
- Dubai (VARA) VASP — Stronger UAE/MENA positioning for reputation-led VASP operations
- Canada (MSB) MSB — Faster registration-style route with recognised compliance framing
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Activity fit for this route
Review which crypto activities fit within the scope of this route.
Exchange operations fit within the permitted activities of this route.
Custody may require separate review or additional controls.
Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.
Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
EU passporting not available from this route.
High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.
Not sure if your model fits? Request a licensing assessment
Business model fit — Philippines
Assess how well this route covers your planned activities.
Fit score
- Good fit
- 1/6
- Partial fit
- 5/6
- Poor fit
- 0/6
Philippines may not cover your primary activities
Consider an alternative route that better matches your activity profile.
Is Philippines VASP authorisation right for your project?
Best for
- Philippines VASP operations
Not suitable for
- Low-cost setup
- Projects without a prepared banking strategy
Banking difficulty is high for this route. Prepare a banking strategy before committing to the Philippines route.
Core requirements
Use this section to check the main regulatory and operational requirements before committing to a jurisdiction.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Local presence and substance
The CSV snapshot lists local staff, physical office and audit as required. This makes the route unsuitable for a paper-only setup and requires a real operating plan before the application is positioned commercially.
Local staff
RequiredRequired
At least one locally-accountable staff member or director is expected.
Physical office
RequiredRequired
A genuine office presence is expected, not a nominal registered address.
Audit
RequiredRequired
External audit is required for ongoing supervision compliance.
Planning notes
- Plan local management, compliance ownership and operational accountability before filing.
- Budget for office, staff, audit and ongoing reporting rather than application fees only.
- Keep governance evidence aligned with the activity map and fiat flow model.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Cost breakdown
Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Cost breakdown — Philippines
Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.
| Cost item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Service priceApplication preparation and professional services. | €70,800 |
| State fee | €1,600 |
| Required share capitalMust be held, not an expenditure. | €800,000 |
Summary
- One-off costs
- €872,400
- Annual (year 1)
- €0
- Total year 1
- €872,400
Adjust to convert to your base currency.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Application process
The sequence below shows the usual project flow. Exact steps depend on the regulator, business model and application scope. Philippines — From 3 months.
Pre-assessment and scope review
1–3 weeksDefine the activity scope, governance model and target markets before formal preparation.
Company setup in Philippines
2–6 weeksEstablish legal entity, appoint local staff and set up local operating structure.
Documentation and compliance packBottleneck risk
3–8 weeksPrepare AML/CFT policies, governance documents, controls framework and application materials.
Application submission to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
1–2 weeksSubmit complete application with all required documentation.
Regulator reviewBottleneck risk
From 3 monthsRegulator reviews the application. May request clarifications. Incomplete files extend this phase.
Depends on: File quality and completeness
Authorisation or registration confirmation
1–4 weeksRegulator confirms authorisation or registration. Commence operations.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
What can delay or increase cost
These factors are most likely to affect timelines and budgets for this route.
Setup complexity is rated high for Philippines. Company setup, governance and documentation take longer than average.
Banking difficulty is rated high. Opening accounts for crypto businesses in Philippines requires extensive documentation.
Ongoing supervision, audit and compliance costs are above average. Budget for these separately from the application fee.
Incomplete files are the most common cause of delay. Regulator queries extend review by weeks or months.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Banking and PSP onboarding
Banking difficulty is marked medium to high and PSP availability is medium. BSP supervision can support the compliance narrative, but banks and payment providers will still examine activity scope, token policy, customer geography, source of funds, transaction monitoring and audit evidence.
Reflects how challenging it is to open and maintain business bank accounts in this jurisdiction.
Reflects availability of payment service providers willing to onboard crypto-licensed entities.
A licence or registration does not guarantee bank account or payment provider approval. Banking feasibility should be reviewed before the application strategy is finalized.
Preparation checklist
- Prepare a banking pack before treating the route as commercially ready.
- Expect enhanced diligence for custody, exchange, high-risk customer segments, cross-border flows or complex token listings.
- Do not promise account opening or PSP approval as part of the licence timeline.
Compliance documentation
Most crypto licensing routes require a documented compliance framework before submission, not only after approval.
- RequiredAML/CFT policy and risk assessmentDocument your customer risk model and control framework.
- RequiredCustomer due diligence (CDD) procedures
- RequiredEnhanced due diligence (EDD) proceduresFor high-risk clients and jurisdictions.
- RequiredTransaction monitoring system and rules
- RequiredSanctions screening procedures
- RequiredSuspicious activity reporting (SAR) process
- RequiredMLRO / Compliance officer appointmentLocal accountability may be required.
- RecommendedBoard-approved governance charter
- ConditionalOutsourcing policy and monitoringRequired if functions are outsourced.
- RecommendedICT / cybersecurity policy
- RequiredComplaints handling procedure
- RequiredAnnual external audit engagementRequired for ongoing supervision compliance.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Documents to prepare
Preparing these materials before filing reduces regulator questions and helps with banking or payment provider onboarding.
Corporate documents
AML and compliance
Operational
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Regulator profile
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Moderate reputation; assess banking and partner acceptance case by case.
Reflects documentation depth, governance requirements and expected review friction.
Reflects likelihood of delays, additional information requests or policy uncertainty.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Risk assessment
Main risk dimensions for the Philippines route.
Route risk rating — banking difficulty: Medium to high. Authorisation does not guarantee bank account opening.
Mitigation: Start banking outreach and compliance preparation before the application.
Route risk rating — setup complexity: High.
Route risk rating — maintenance cost: High. Budget for ongoing compliance, fees and supervision separately.
Route risk rating — regulatory risk: Medium. Weak compliance, vague scope or insufficient controls increase review risk.
Mitigation: Prepare an evidence-based compliance file before submission.
Route risk rating — regulatory reputation: Medium.
This content is for general orientation only. Crypto regulation changes quickly and the final scope should be confirmed through a jurisdiction-specific legal review before filing or incorporation.
Philippines vs other VASP routes
Use the Philippines as an onshore Southeast Asia operating route. Compare Malta for EU passporting, Dubai for higher-reputation UAE/MENA VASP positioning and Canada for a faster registration-style option with different scope limits.
Philippines
VASP
- Price
- 70 800 EUR
- Timeline
- From 3 months
- Passporting
- No passporting
- Banking
- Medium to high
- Reputation
- Medium
Malta (MiCA)
MICA
- Price
- 20 700 EUR
- Timeline
- From 6 months
- Passporting
- EU/EEA
- Banking
- Medium
- Reputation
- High
+ EU/EEA passporting for European client acquisition
− Requires EU substance and a longer authorisation plan
View routeDubai (VARA)
VASP
- Price
- 22 300 EUR
- Timeline
- From 6 months
- Passporting
- No passporting
- Banking
- Medium
- Reputation
- High
+ Stronger UAE/MENA positioning for reputation-led VASP operations
− Higher local supervision and activity-specific application burden
View routeCanada (MSB)
MSB
- Price
- 20 600 EUR
- Timeline
- From 2 months
- Passporting
- No passporting
- Banking
- Medium
- Reputation
- High
+ Faster registration-style route with recognised compliance framing
− MSB registration is not a broad VASP licence
View routeFees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Philippines vs other VASP jurisdictions
Compare key parameters across VASP-regulated jurisdictions.
Check your readiness for Philippines VASP authorisation
Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.
From 800 000 EUR minimum capital required.
Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.
Board, management, accountability chain defined.
Banking strategy and identified partners.
Local staff and office in Philippines.
Readiness status
Answer the criteria on the left to see your readiness status.
Frequently asked questions
No. The activity scope must be mapped to the actual exchange, custody, wallet, brokerage, payment, advisory, staking, lending or investment features. Some activities may need additional review or may sit outside the intended BSP VASP scope.
Usually no. The CSV snapshot lists high setup complexity, high maintenance cost, from 800 000 EUR share capital, local staff, physical office and audit requirements.
No. The Philippines route is classified as no passporting. EU/EEA access should be assessed through MiCA/CASP or another appropriate EU route.
Prepare the activity map, ownership and fit-and-proper file, capital plan, local office and staffing model, AML and sanctions framework, transaction monitoring, cybersecurity controls, audit readiness and banking or PSP pack.
The CSV snapshot marks banking difficulty as medium to high and PSP availability as medium. Onboarding depends on the activity scope, fiat flows, token policy, client geography, AML controls and the risk appetite of each bank or provider.
The page is not legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for advice from qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.
Your dedicated specialists
Enrico
Rein
Jurata
Andrej
Marta
Katrin
Inga
Request a Philippines VASP assessment
Share your planned activities, target markets and timeline. We will review which crypto licensing route is likely to fit.