Non-passporting licence routeDigital asset business licence / registrationNo passporting

Digital Asset Business Licence in Bermuda

Bermuda is a regulated offshore DAB route for projects that want stronger reputation than a simple offshore setup and can support BMA supervision, office, audit and ongoing compliance.

Processing time
From 4 months
Service price
27 000 EUR
Required share capital
12 000 USD
State fee
2,266 USD
Annual supervision fee
2,266 USD
Banking difficulty
Medium
RegulatorBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA)
Market access
No passporting

What is a Bermuda Digital Asset Business licence?

A Bermuda DAB licence is a supervised BMA route for defined digital asset business activity. It is not a low-cost offshore company setup: the correct licence class, activity scope, custody model, governance, audit and ongoing supervision must be matched before relying on the route.

Best fit: serious digital asset businesses that need regulated offshore reputation and can support BMA supervision.

Not the right fit: projects seeking only a cheap shell, EU passporting or minimal compliance.

Core decision: whether the business belongs in Test, Modified or Full DAB licence treatment.

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

BMA DAB licence classes

Bermuda route selection should start with the licence class. Test, Modified and Full DAB categories support different stages and risk profiles.

  • TestRelevant

    Test licence: proof-of-concept or limited pilot where the model still needs controlled validation.

    Constraints: Best suited to controlled pilots or proof-of-concept activity.

  • ModifiedRelevant

    Modified licence: constrained operating model or limited expansion with defined restrictions.

    Constraints: Used where the business operates with defined restrictions or phased scale.

  • FullRelevant

    Full licence: mature digital asset business with broader live operations and stronger ongoing supervision.

    Constraints: Relevant to mature live operations with the broadest supervisory burden.

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Bermuda DAB activity scope

Map exchange, custody, wallet, transfer, payment or other digital asset activity against the BMA route before treating Bermuda as a generic offshore solution.

DAB activity coverage

  • Exchange

    Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.

    Conditional
  • Custody

    Custody may require separate review or additional controls.

    Conditional
  • Brokerage

    Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.

    Conditional
  • Wallet provider

    Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.

    Conditional
  • EU market

    EU passporting not available from this route.

    Not covered
  • Startups

    High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.

    Not covered

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Bermuda positioning for digital asset businesses

Bermuda should be framed as a reputation-led regulated offshore route: useful for serious digital asset businesses, weak for cheap-shell or low-documentation positioning.

Regulatory reputation

High

Positive
Banking access

Medium

Caution
Regulatory risk

Low to medium

Caution

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Ongoing supervision and maintenance

Regulatory authority · Bermuda

Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA)

Bermuda DAB should include annual supervision, audit, reporting, compliance monitoring, policy refresh, office cost and banking maintenance.

Official regulator website
Regulatory reputation
High

Strong international recognition and established supervision track record.

Setup complexity
High

Reflects documentation depth, governance requirements and expected review friction.

Regulatory risk
Medium

Reflects likelihood of delays, additional information requests or policy uncertainty.

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Business model fit — Bermuda

Assess how well this route covers your planned activities.

Fit score

Good fit
0/6
Partial fit
6/6
Poor fit
0/6

Bermuda may not cover your primary activities

Consider an alternative route that better matches your activity profile.

Is Bermuda digital asset business route right for your project?

Best for

  • Digital asset business with strong offshore reputation

Not suitable for

  • Low-budget startups

Custody and safeguarding controls

Custody or exchange models should show client asset protection, wallet governance, segregation, cybersecurity, operational resilience and incident response before BMA filing.

Custody safeguards

  • Client asset segregation and reconciliation process
    Required
  • Wallet governance, private key control and transaction approval model
    Required
  • Cybersecurity, incident response and business continuity evidence
    Strongly rec.
  • Outsourcing, custodian and technology-provider oversight
    Strongly rec.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Bermuda substance and governance

The BMA route needs a credible operating model: office planning, governance ownership, audit, compliance responsibility and ongoing supervisory communication should be visible before application.

Local staff

Not required

Not required

Review local person requirements before setup.

Physical office

Required

Required

A genuine office presence is expected, not a nominal registered address.

Audit

Required

Required

External audit is required for ongoing supervision compliance.

Planning notes

  • Define who owns compliance, custody, operations and regulator-facing reporting.
  • Plan physical presence and audit support as operating costs, not optional extras.
  • Document how offshore management decisions are controlled and evidenced.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Cost breakdown

Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.

Service price (professional fees)Application preparation and professional services.
27 000 EUR EURFixed
State fee
2,266 USDFrom
Annual supervision feeRecurring annual cost after authorisation.
2,266 USDFrom
Required share capitalMust be held, not an expenditure.
12 000 USDFrom
High ongoing cost

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Cost breakdown — Bermuda

Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.

Cost itemAmount
Service priceApplication preparation and professional services.€27,000
State fee€2,266
Required share capitalMust be held, not an expenditure.€12,000

Summary

One-off costs
€41,266
Annual (year 1)
€0
Total year 1
€41,266

Adjust to convert to your base currency.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Application process

The sequence below shows the usual project flow. Exact steps depend on the regulator, business model and application scope. Bermuda — From 4 months.

Total timelineFrom 4 months
  1. Pre-assessment and scope review

    1–3 weeks

    Define the activity scope, governance model and target markets before formal preparation.

  2. Company setup in Bermuda

    2–6 weeks

    Establish legal entity with required governance structure.

  3. Documentation and compliance packBottleneck risk

    3–8 weeks

    Prepare AML/CFT policies, governance documents, controls framework and application materials.

  4. Application submission to Bermuda Monetary Authority

    1–2 weeks

    Submit complete application with all required documentation.

  5. Regulator reviewBottleneck risk

    From 4 months

    Regulator reviews the application. May request clarifications. Incomplete files extend this phase.

    Depends on: File quality and completeness

  6. Authorisation or registration confirmation

    1–4 weeks

    Regulator confirms authorisation or registration. Commence operations.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

What can delay or increase cost

These factors are most likely to affect timelines and budgets for this route.

High setup complexity
High

Setup complexity is rated high for Bermuda. Company setup, governance and documentation take longer than average.

Likely impactAdd 4–8 weeks to the preparation phase.
MitigationStart company setup and governance planning immediately after scope confirmation.
High maintenance cost
Medium

Ongoing supervision, audit and compliance costs are above average. Budget for these separately from the application fee.

Likely impactRecurring annual cost significantly above the one-time service price.
MitigationModel annual compliance costs before committing to this route.
Application completeness
Medium

Incomplete files are the most common cause of delay. Regulator queries extend review by weeks or months.

Likely impactEach regulator query adds 2–6 weeks to the review phase.
MitigationUse a structured compliance pack. Review file completeness before submission.

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Banking and payment provider route

A crypto licence or registration does not automatically solve banking. Review account opening, PSP access and fiat flow requirements before finalizing the route.

Banking difficulty
Medium

Reflects how challenging it is to open and maintain business bank accounts in this jurisdiction.

Medium PSP availability
Medium

Reflects availability of payment service providers willing to onboard crypto-licensed entities.

A licence or registration does not guarantee bank account or payment provider approval. Banking feasibility should be reviewed before the application strategy is finalized.

Preparation checklist

  • Business model and transaction flow description
  • AML/KYC and sanctions controls
  • Expected fiat currencies and payment corridors
  • Source of funds and source of wealth documentation
  • Custody, token and counterparty policies where relevant

Compliance documentation

Most crypto licensing routes require a documented compliance framework before submission, not only after approval.

  • Required
    AML/CFT policy and risk assessmentDocument your customer risk model and control framework.
  • Required
    Customer due diligence (CDD) procedures
  • Required
    Enhanced due diligence (EDD) proceduresFor high-risk clients and jurisdictions.
  • Required
    Transaction monitoring system and rules
  • Required
    Sanctions screening procedures
  • Required
    Suspicious activity reporting (SAR) process
  • Required
    MLRO / Compliance officer appointmentLocal accountability may be required.
  • Recommended
    Board-approved governance charter
  • Conditional
    Outsourcing policy and monitoringRequired if functions are outsourced.
  • Recommended
    ICT / cybersecurity policy
  • Required
    Complaints handling procedure
  • Required
    Annual external audit engagementRequired for ongoing supervision compliance.

Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.

Documents to prepare

Preparing these materials before filing reduces regulator questions and helps with banking or payment provider onboarding.

0 / 11 required
Required
Recommended
Depends on scope

Corporate documents

AML and compliance

Operational

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Risk assessment

Main risk dimensions for the Bermuda route.

Setup complexity
High

Route risk rating — setup complexity: High.

Maintenance cost
High

Route risk rating — maintenance cost: High. Budget for ongoing compliance, fees and supervision separately.

Regulatory reputation
High

Route risk rating — regulatory reputation: High.

Regulatory risk
Medium

Route risk rating — regulatory risk: Low to medium. Weak compliance, vague scope or insufficient controls increase review risk.

Mitigation: Prepare an evidence-based compliance file before submission.

Banking difficulty
Medium

Route risk rating — banking difficulty: Medium. Authorisation does not guarantee bank account opening.

Mitigation: Start banking outreach and compliance preparation before the application.

This content is for general orientation only. Crypto regulation changes quickly and the final scope should be confirmed through a jurisdiction-specific legal review before filing or incorporation.

Bermuda DAB vs alternatives

Compare Bermuda with Bahamas DAB, Dubai VASP, MiCA/CASP for EU access and Panama/general routes where users only need feasibility.

Current

Bermuda

DIGITAL-ASSET-BUSINESS

Price
27 000 EUR
Timeline
From 4 months
Passporting
No passporting
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

Dubai (VASP)

VASP

Price
22 300 EUR
Timeline
From 6 months
Passporting
No passporting
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

+ Strong non-EU regulated VASP route

Higher local operating presence in Dubai

View route

Malta (MiCA)

MICA

Price
20 700 EUR
Timeline
From 6 months
Passporting
EU/EEA
Banking
Medium
Reputation
High

+ EU/EEA passporting

Not an offshore DAB route

View route

Panama

GENERAL

Price
13 500 EUR
Timeline
From 3 months
Passporting
No passporting
Banking
High
Reputation
Low

+ Lower-cost feasibility route

No dedicated DAB licence and weaker banking story

View route

Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.

Bermuda vs other DAB routes

Compare digital asset business routes by licence class, supervision and operating model.

Sort by:

Check your readiness for Bermuda DAB licensing

Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.

Share capital

12 000 USD minimum capital required.

AML/CFT framework

Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.

Governance structure

Board, management, accountability chain defined.

Banking preparation

Banking strategy and identified partners.

Readiness status

Answer the criteria on the left to see your readiness status.

Frequently asked questions

No. Bermuda is better positioned as a regulated offshore reputation route with meaningful setup and maintenance obligations.

The BMA describes Test, Modified and Full DAB licence categories. The correct class depends on the business stage and activity scope.

No. EU/EEA access should be reviewed through MiCA/CASP.

It can be attractive for digital asset businesses that want regulated offshore reputation and can support BMA supervision, office, audit and compliance.

The page is not legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for advice from qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

Your dedicated specialists

  • Enrico Kärvinen

    Enrico

  • Rein Tammik

    Rein

  • Jurata Žukaitė

    Jurata

  • Andrej Kazlauskas

    Andrej

  • Marta Värna

    Marta

  • Katrin Lepik

    Katrin

  • Inga Stankavičiūtė

    Inga

Request a Bermuda DAB assessment

Share your planned activities, target markets and timeline. We will review which crypto licensing route is likely to fit.

Leave open if you want a country comparison.
Select every activity you plan to offer. The licence route may change if you include custody, exchange, trading platform or fiat flows.
Include service fees, regulator fees, share capital, local office or staff, audit and ongoing compliance.

By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted about your crypto licensing request. Do not include passwords, private keys or confidential customer data.