CASP Authorisation in Ireland
Ireland is a CBI-supervised EU/MiCA CASP route for teams that want an English-speaking EU base, institutional governance standards and potential EU/EEA passporting, while accepting demanding substance, compliance and banking expectations.
Confirm current Central Bank of Ireland CASP/MiCA authorisation requirements, forms, fees, timelines and supervisory expectations before using this page for client advice.
Regulatory status should be confirmed by local counsel before relying on this route.
What is Ireland CASP authorisation?
Ireland CASP authorisation is the Irish EU route for crypto-asset service providers under MiCA, supervised by the Central Bank of Ireland. It is best understood as a regulated financial-services authorisation for teams that need an English-speaking EU base, not as a quick offshore setup.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Regulator
- Central Bank of Ireland (CBI)
- Regime
- CASP
- Legal basis
- Legal basis: MiCA CASP authorisation supervised in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
CASP service scope in Ireland
An Ireland CASP application should start with a precise service perimeter. Exchange, custody, brokerage, wallet, advisory, staking-adjacent and payment-related models can each change the evidence expected for governance, safeguarding, AML and technology controls.
Exchange
ConditionalExchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
Exchange
Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
ConditionalCustody
ConditionalCustody may require separate review or additional controls.
Custody
Custody may require separate review or additional controls.
ConditionalBrokerage
ConditionalBrokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.
Brokerage
Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.
ConditionalWallet provider
ConditionalExchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
Wallet provider
Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
ConditionalEU market
IncludedEU/EEA passporting available.
EU market
EU/EEA passporting available.
IncludedStartups
ExcludedHigh setup complexity means significant budget is needed.
Startups
High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.
Excluded
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
EU/EEA passporting from Ireland
Ireland can support an EU/EEA passporting strategy for approved MiCA CASP services, but the commercial story should be tied to the authorised scope, target markets and notification process. It should not be sold as automatic access to every EU activity.
Define target EU/EEA countries, client categories and distribution channels before filing.
Map each passporting plan to the specific CASP services the Irish entity intends to provide.
Explain why Ireland is the right operating base for English-speaking EU operations, management accountability and institutional client expectations.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Capital, governance and audit expectations
Ireland is a high-complexity route. The CSV snapshot indicates share capital from 50,000 EUR, no separate state fee indicated in CSV, no annual fee indicated in CSV, local staff, physical office and audit. The main cost driver is the governance and compliance model that must be maintained after authorisation.
- Board, senior management, compliance, AML and technology owners should be credible, accountable and aligned with Irish substance.highBoard, senior management, compliance, AML and technology owners should be credible, accountable and aligned with Irish substance.high
- Capital planning should match the selected CASP services, especially for exchange, custody or fiat-heavy operations.highCapital planning should match the selected CASP services, especially for exchange, custody or fiat-heavy operations.high
- Audit, reporting, outsourcing oversight, incident management and compliance monitoring should be budgeted as ongoing obligations.highAudit, reporting, outsourcing oversight, incident management and compliance monitoring should be budgeted as ongoing obligations.high
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Ireland CASP application bottlenecks
Typical blockers are operating-model weaknesses: unclear service scope, insufficient Irish accountability, generic AML policies, late banking preparation and a passporting plan that is not tied to approved activities.
- High
Unclear CASP service perimeter or post-authorisation passporting plan
- High
Weak Irish substance, management accountability or AML ownership
- High
Generic policies that do not match institutional, EU or cross-border client flows
- High
Underdeveloped custody, wallet, safeguarding or technology-control evidence
- High
Banking or PSP package prepared after the application strategy
- High
Route selection driven by budget or speed rather than CBI-supervised EU CASP operations
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Activity fit for this route
Review which crypto activities fit within the scope of this route.
Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
Custody may require separate review or additional controls.
Brokerage or OTC activity typically fits within scope.
Exchange activity may require additional scope or separate licensing.
EU/EEA passporting available.
High setup complexity means significant budget is needed.
Not sure if your model fits? Request a licensing assessment
Is Ireland CASP authorisation right for your project?
Best for
- EU passporting and regulated CASP operations
- EU/EEA market access
Not suitable for
- Low-budget or fast offshore setup
- Projects without a prepared banking strategy
Banking difficulty is high for this route. Prepare a banking strategy before committing to the Ireland route.
Core requirements
Use this section to check the main regulatory and operational requirements before committing to a jurisdiction.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Local substance in Ireland
Local staff and a physical office should be treated as real operating requirements. Ireland is suitable when the applicant can place management, compliance and operational accountability into a defensible Irish model.
Local staff
RequiredRequired
At least one locally-accountable staff member or director is expected.
Physical office
RequiredRequired
A genuine office presence is expected, not a nominal registered address.
Audit
RequiredRequired
External audit is required for ongoing supervision compliance.
Planning notes
- Plan Irish compliance and AML ownership before submission.
- Document what is controlled locally and what is outsourced to group or third-party providers.
- Budget staff, office, audit and ongoing compliance separately from the advisory application fee.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Cost breakdown
Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Cost breakdown — Ireland
Budget for service price, regulatory fees, share capital and ongoing costs separately.
| Cost item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Service priceApplication preparation and professional services. | €21,200 |
| Required share capitalMust be held, not an expenditure. | €50,000 |
Summary
- One-off costs
- €71,200
- Annual (year 1)
- €0
- Total year 1
- €71,200
Adjust to convert to your base currency.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Application process
The sequence below shows the usual project flow. Exact steps depend on the regulator, business model and application scope. Ireland — From 6 months.
Pre-assessment and scope review
1–3 weeksDefine the activity scope, governance model and target markets before formal preparation.
Company setup in Ireland
2–6 weeksEstablish legal entity, appoint local staff and set up local operating structure.
Documentation and compliance packBottleneck risk
3–8 weeksPrepare AML/CFT policies, governance documents, controls framework and application materials.
Application submission to Central Bank of Ireland
1–2 weeksSubmit complete application with all required documentation.
Regulator reviewBottleneck risk
From 6 monthsRegulator reviews the application. May request clarifications. Incomplete files extend this phase.
Depends on: File quality and completeness
Authorisation or registration confirmation
1–4 weeksRegulator confirms authorisation or registration. Commence operations.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
What can delay or increase cost
These factors are most likely to affect timelines and budgets for this route.
Setup complexity is rated high for Ireland. Company setup, governance and documentation take longer than average.
Banking difficulty is rated high. Opening accounts for crypto businesses in Ireland requires extensive documentation.
Ongoing supervision, audit and compliance costs are above average. Budget for these separately from the application fee.
Incomplete files are the most common cause of delay. Regulator queries extend review by weeks or months.
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Banking and PSP strategy in Ireland
Ireland has a high regulatory reputation, but banking difficulty remains medium to high. Bank and PSP readiness should run in parallel with the CBI authorisation file, especially for exchange, custody and fiat-heavy models.
Reflects how challenging it is to open and maintain business bank accounts in this jurisdiction.
Reflects availability of payment service providers willing to onboard crypto-licensed entities.
A licence or registration does not guarantee bank account or payment provider approval. Banking feasibility should be reviewed before the application strategy is finalized.
Preparation checklist
- Prepare ownership, source-of-funds, flow-of-funds, token policy and client geography materials early.
- Explain fiat rails, safeguarding, reconciliation and transaction monitoring before approaching banks or PSPs.
- Do not assume CASP authorisation will automatically solve account opening or payment provider onboarding.
Business model fit — Ireland
Assess how well this route covers your planned activities.
Fit score
- Good fit
- 0/6
- Partial fit
- 6/6
- Poor fit
- 0/6
Ireland may not cover your primary activities
Consider an alternative route that better matches your activity profile.
CBI application profile
Central Bank of Ireland (CBI)
A CBI-supervised CASP file should read like an institutional financial-services application. The Central Bank of Ireland is likely to expect a clear business model, accountable governance, fit-and-proper management, robust AML controls, safeguarding, technology resilience and a practical bank or PSP strategy.
- AML, sanctions, transaction monitoring, travel rule and suspicious activity workflows should match the product and client geography.
- Governance should show real Irish decision-making rather than a nominal office with offshore control.
- Outsourcing, group support and technology providers should be controlled through documented oversight and escalation paths.
- Fees, timelines, forms and regulator process should be rechecked before client-facing reliance.
Strong international recognition and established supervision track record.
Reflects documentation depth, governance requirements and expected review friction.
Reflects likelihood of delays, additional information requests or policy uncertainty.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Compliance documentation
Most crypto licensing routes require a documented compliance framework before submission, not only after approval.
- RequiredAML/CFT policy and risk assessmentDocument your customer risk model and control framework.
- RequiredCustomer due diligence (CDD) procedures
- RequiredEnhanced due diligence (EDD) proceduresFor high-risk clients and jurisdictions.
- RequiredTransaction monitoring system and rules
- RequiredSanctions screening procedures
- RequiredSuspicious activity reporting (SAR) process
- RequiredMLRO / Compliance officer appointmentLocal accountability may be required.
- RecommendedBoard-approved governance charter
- ConditionalOutsourcing policy and monitoringRequired if functions are outsourced.
- RecommendedICT / cybersecurity policy
- RequiredComplaints handling procedure
- RequiredAnnual external audit engagementRequired for ongoing supervision compliance.
Country-specific regulatory statements should be checked against current regulator guidance before relying on this route.
Documents to prepare
Preparing these materials before filing reduces regulator questions and helps with banking or payment provider onboarding.
Corporate documents
AML and compliance
Operational
Fees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Risk assessment
Main risk dimensions for the Ireland route.
Route risk rating — banking difficulty: Medium to high. Authorisation does not guarantee bank account opening.
Mitigation: Start banking outreach and compliance preparation before the application.
Route risk rating — setup complexity: High.
Route risk rating — maintenance cost: High. Budget for ongoing compliance, fees and supervision separately.
Route risk rating — regulatory reputation: High.
Route risk rating — regulatory risk: Low to medium. Weak compliance, vague scope or insufficient controls increase review risk.
Mitigation: Prepare an evidence-based compliance file before submission.
This content is for general orientation only. Crypto regulation changes quickly and the final scope should be confirmed through a jurisdiction-specific legal review before filing or incorporation.
Ireland CASP vs alternatives
Compare Ireland with Malta CASP for an established EU crypto supervision profile, Netherlands CASP for another high-reputation EU institutional route, Portugal CASP for Iberian and Portuguese-speaking market logic, and UK AML as a non-EU contrast that does not provide EU/EEA passporting.
Ireland
CASP
- Price
- 21 200 EUR
- Timeline
- From 6 months
- Passporting
- EU/EEA
- Banking
- Medium to high
- Reputation
- High
Malta (CASP)
CASP
- Price
- 20 700 EUR
- Timeline
- From 6 months
- Passporting
- EU/EEA
- Banking
- Medium to high
- Reputation
- High
+ Established EU/MiCA crypto supervision profile
− Not a lighter route; MFSA substance and compliance burden remain material
View routeNetherlands (CASP)
CASP
- Passporting
- EU/EEA
- Banking
- Medium to high
- Reputation
- High
+ EU financial-services jurisdiction with strong institutional credibility
− Requires separate validation of Dutch regulator process, timing and fees
View routePortugal (CASP)
CASP
- Price
- 18 900 EUR
- Timeline
- From 6 months
- Passporting
- EU/EEA
- Banking
- Medium to high
- Reputation
- High
+ EU/MiCA route with Iberian and Portuguese-speaking market logic
− Still a high-complexity route with local substance and AML expectations
View routeUnited Kingdom (AML)
UK-AML
- Passporting
- No EU passporting
- Banking
- High
- Reputation
- High
+ Useful non-EU contrast for UK-facing AML registration strategy
− Not an EU CASP authorisation and does not provide EU/EEA passporting
View routeFees, timelines and capital figures are indicative and may vary by business model, regulator feedback, application scope and third-party costs.
Ireland vs other CASP routes
Compare key parameters across CASP authorisation routes.
Check your readiness for Ireland CASP authorisation
Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.
From 50 000 EUR minimum capital required.
Documented AML/CFT policies, risk assessment, compliance officer.
Board, management, accountability chain defined.
Banking strategy and identified partners.
Local staff and office in Ireland.
Readiness status
Answer the criteria on the left to see your readiness status.
Frequently asked questions
Ireland CASP authorisation under MiCA can support EU/EEA passporting, but it should not be described as automatic. Passporting depends on the approved service scope, the operating model and the required notification process.
It is best suited for teams that want CBI-supervised EU CASP operations, an English-speaking EU base, institutional governance credibility and a serious EU passporting strategy.
No. Ireland should be treated as a high-complexity EU authorisation route. It is usually unsuitable for low-budget projects or teams looking for a fast offshore structure without substantial governance, substance and compliance readiness.
Expect scrutiny of service scope, ownership, fit-and-proper management, AML, sanctions, travel rule, transaction monitoring, Irish substance, safeguarding, outsourcing, technology controls, audit and banking or PSP readiness.
Compare Malta, Netherlands and Portugal as EU/MiCA CASP routes with different jurisdictional positioning. Compare the UK AML route only as a non-EU contrast because it does not provide EU/EEA passporting.
The page is not legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for advice from qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.
Your dedicated specialists

Enrico

Rein

Jurata

Andrej

Marta

Katrin

Inga
Request a Ireland CASP assessment
Share your planned activities, target markets and timeline. We will review which crypto licensing route is likely to fit.